Why do ads always have to have a model who is "beautiful"? This is probably because the ad makers did not care as to whom they are influencing. Although, they may have known already about this. Since the 1900's, ads have been tilting ever so slightly for a hundred years. Not only does this teach girls they are not important, it also makes boys judge girls by appearance. This kind of goes against what the women's right act was for. They wanted to be equal, but now they are not. In an example, the news team asked a person not how the woman anchor did, but if her clothes fitted her or if her legs looked good. We need to gather people to make anti-ads and try to ask for funding to attempt an action to get the governments attention at how they are polluting kids minds. To make sure media will act ethically, they must stop these ads and hire people who do the job because they want to, not because they want to on the condition that they get more beautiful or buy nicer clothes. Traditionally, ads were to make you get or do whatever it told you to. Now it is just for watching and not to figure out about some product.Here is a link to an article against stopping ads from photoshopping